Emergency In Egypt and The Middle East: Opportunity or Threat

What might the events in the Middle East mean to you and your business? Where will the revolutionary spirit end? Is this a Major Opportunity or Major Threat to your business?

Join Dalip Raheja and Tim Cummins as they discuss some of the implications to world trade and the world of contracting and procurement.
Ask The Expert Special Edition

Revolution in the Middle East: Major Opportunity or Major Threat?

Wednesday 23 March: 4PM Central EU, 3 PM UK, 10 AM Eastern NA, 9 AM Central NA, 7 AM Pacific NA

Register via: http://www.iaccm.com/events/register/?id=1089
Non-IACCM members will be able to register for free using IACCMguest (case specific) as the code.

Did you like this? Share it:

The Inevitability of Crisis

As events continue to unfold in Egypt, I keep thinking about whether there are any lessons from a supply chain perspective that we should be taking away.  And the answer is, without discussing the religious or social aspects, of course there is.

There are certainly the obvious risk management / disaster recovery issues regarding interruptions in supply and demand for enterprises that either use Egyptian suppliers or distribute to (or through) Egyptian customers / channels. Have alternative supply arrangements been made? Where will firms replace the revenues lost from customers impacted by the situation?  Were alternative distribution channels in place?

From a forecasting perspective, could the recent events be anticipated? Could we have looked at Tunisia as a predictor? Should we be looking at Tunisia and now Egypt as a predictor for Jordan, Saudi Arabia, or other countries in a similar situation? Does an enterprise look at its peers as part of their disaster recovery / risk management planning program? Are there other entities that an enterprise should be looking?

At a higher level, looking at the challenges of supporting historically strategic partners, while they go through significant changes, how can/should an enterprise react? Can/should an enterprise impose its principles on those of their customers/suppliers? Currently several of the news articles are demanding a response from the US government, which puts them in a very awkward predicament. They want to support Egypt who has previously supported the US in the past, but don’t want to put the US in a worse situation in the future.

From a governance and decision making perspective, who within an enterprise is responsible for managing through a catastrophic even?  Enterprises continuously face far less significant challenges. Where is the line below which certain stakeholders are empowered to address / resolve conflict? I believe most executive teams are “always the last to know”. Are there mechanisms in place so that impending issues are elevated to the appropriate decision makers early enough?

From a communications perspective, the reports of how Egypt attempted to control wireless and internet based communications are scary. In a free market economy, how can/should an enterprise control communications?

From a speed perspective, how quickly can an enterprise react to a catastrophic event? Are decisions being made quickly enough? Is a correct decision made too late worse than making a wrong decision made more quickly?

Throughout all this, I still wonder, what was the “triggering event” that caused the situation to escalate at this specific time – Why not earlier? Why not later?

As the events unfold, I believe that there will be several “lessons learned” that will be looked upon by enterprise leaders around the world. What if something like this happened to “us” (wherever you are)? Where will be the next break down of government structure?

Did you like this? Share it: